(Sent to Woodmen Hills) You forwarded this message on 6/17/2017 4:17 AM
Woodmen Hills billing department.
Mr. Bendelow being copied so this matter can be addressed once and for all.
I am re-requesting any and all the records associated with the account number 04660 as the previous account associated to Mr. Pace
When I say ALL records I mean and not limited to the following, payment history, billing statements, notes on the account, collection actions, copies of any and all checks for payments made by me any and all correspondence referring to copies of bank statements submitted showing the escrow account where I deposited the “park and rec” fee in US Bank.
In essence I submitted checks as proof of payment, copies of those. When the documents are ready you can send them electronically. If you have any concerns or issues take them up with Mr. Bendelow.
As Mr. Bendelow is of the opinion that my BK lawyer received this information that assumption is incorrect as the only document submitted was the “final bill” as shown in exhibit to the court.
Also produce a copy of the account ledger for all transactions as there should be one since Woodmen Hills uses Quick Books Pro and there is a section for all ledger transactions.
The dates are for all of 2015 n 2016
Should anyone associated with this request have any issues or is confused as to the information sought do not hesitate to pick up the phone and call Mr. Pace who’s phone number is of record.
If there is an issue on copying the legal department it is being done so you can not claim in the future that you were not “aware” of the situation.
Thanks
R Pace
_________________________________________________________
Update; 6-17-2017 Mr. Bendelow responds via message below. I asked for all my records on the account in question and as shown. Mr. Bendelow say “it is unclear what you are seeing the you don’t already have”. Well this is what Mr. Pace proves with facts not lawyer games. I said I want it “all” and provided a written statement on it. See Woodmen Hills once again wastes everyone’s time by claiming they are “unclear” when in reality I spelled it out. I did receive the information that Woodmen Hills sent to the County 2 days later from the treasurer. At issue is the fact the Woodmen Hills submitted information without providing documentation of what the money was that was in the arrears. No accounting of where the money stems from and how it was calculated just a submission of a number and a name. No billing records were submitted nor was any accounting record establishing what was being collected.
Mr. Bendelows response below,
Mr. Pace, in response to you June 13, 2017 request, please be advised:1. Residents contact the District directly if they are inquiring on their own account. They do not contact the attorney, who won’t have the records anyway. This method creates unwanted expense to the District.2. The El Pas County Treasurer request should be the subject of a properly completed CORA request.3. Account information was provided to your attorney as part of your bankruptcy proceeding. It is unclear what you are seeking that you don’t already have.Please follow up with the District, and not counsel, as to these matters.
On 6-13-2017 I sent out a request to get all the records for the issue at hand. Mr. Bendelow didn’t respond with the records he responded with a comment on not contacting him.
Ms. Kirkbride, (Mr. Bendelow copied)
This is Mr. Pace requesting all my accounting records for my water account from Woodmen Hills since 2015 to 2016Since my records are not CORA as told by prior legal counsel and the district, I want it all!All matters related to the account statements, billing records, payment history, copies of any records related to the account including any receipts payment copies such as checks and bills for the account since 1-2015 thru to 12-2016To include a detailed history of records sent to the County of El Paso and any and all records supplied to them.If you have any questions do not hesitate to contact me asap.R Pace
Update; Confirmation!
Due to the seriousness of the issue I requested all my files and account records from Woodmen Hills today from both lawyers who are of record for WHMD.
To, Mr. Bendelow and Kirkman you were notified to turn over all of my accounting records so don’t play games this time, cause I’m not!
Exposed did hear back from the BK Lawyer who confirms the issue is over a “collection” of past due arrearages on ONE account as Mr. Pace only had one account and kept detailed receipts of the bills and sent copies to my lawyer. I expect the lawyers for Woodmen Hills to put up a fight but that ain’t gonna go over this time as my account is my account and those records are not subject to CORA and the lawyer for Woodmen Hills in BK submitted the second claim to the BK court as shown in the filings.
The original debt was certified and sent to EPCT in November, 2016.
In all fairness I cannot without a reasonable doubt say that Woodmen Hills BK lawyer knew what was taking place cause if he did and did it he is guilty of perjury and filing a false claim so he out is he can say he was “given” the claim information by Peterson for processing since she is the person who is charged with this matter.
El Paso County treasurer just re-sent me all the records sent by Woodmen Hills and have my records of payments and monthly statements.
The bankruptcy court records were filed by the WHMD lawyer and my lawyer got copies.
When are you all going to start holding people accountable for their (illegal) actions? Stop playing victim and start following the law.
If the information obtained from the BK lawyers is correct this is officially a criminal investigation. I am still investigating the matter so PLEASE be patient and as always exposed welcome the facts with proof and documentation not lip service.
This time the proof and facts are black and white.
STAY TUNED!
________________________________________________________
In the latest round of wasting money Woodmen Hills makes several inaccurate claims against “one person” in Woodmen Hills. The corrupt board wasted thousands of your dollars trying to collect zero.
Lets get the proof out their for all to see.
In 2016 Mr. Pace was forced to file Bankruptcy in a real court with real judges due in part to the developers and their hired guns to include members of the puppet board which took part in previous schemes to buy elections to get a puppet board. The truth is posted in the Colorado Secretary of State and Office of administrative courts on record. It included businessmen of the local area and other puppets who were also lying threw their teeth at the time to cover for election investors.
The names are of record in testimony so no need to go over them but Pizzi, Bliss, Green, Killett, Case, and a slew of lawyers not to mention incarnation of two more non-profits which were fronts for hiding money used to win elections and buys votes to get their money back as shown.
In question is the debt just over 750.00 dollars from past park and rec fees sent to the county for processing as is customary and said by Bill Lewis the old lawyer at one of his last meetings (videoed taped).
(correction) the county says that the old lawyers name is mentioned in the collection matter so the true first lawyer is not Mr. B it was Mr. L.
Its my understanding from my BK lawyer that first came Steve Bendelow and who charged the district under $2,500.00 (estimated) at first to make and appearance for Woodmen Hills as a creditor in court which was not necessary as they were not the ones collecting the debt. That’s right they were not the “creditor” the county is as a resolution filed and passed in November showed they sent the account to collections for collection as certified to El Paso County for collections as is legally allowed.
Then came another lawyer for Woodmen Hills (Niel not real name) who made several appearances in court claiming Mr. Pace owes over $1100.00 to Woodmen Hills filed another (county first claim) claim for its money which was just discovered by Mr. Pace and his lawyer. Now it gets interesting as I just informed my lawyer that if true then Woodmen Hills has messed up. I am awaiting confirmation from my BK lawyer on it now.
All told the district spent just under $5,000.00 (estimated) to collect money it was going to get without filing a thing. Yes that’s right, the corrupted illegal board of directors pissed away thousands to collect a few hundred dollars and then go out into the public and falsely say “one person” is to blame when in reality and in court the district didn’t have to do anything at all.
I used estimates cause the real numbers of money spent were denied in a CORA request for it from WHMD.
The next one is the (estimated) tens of thousands spent on fighting the CRRRG case whereas the district filed an entry of appearance in a case which it claimed it was not part of and then blamed “one man” for it again only to be proven in court with a real judge to be filthy ass liars. Woodmen Hills hired Ryan Call the lawyer involved in the conspiracy and CRRRG so they could claim attorney client and bill Woodmen Hills, for what?
The district spent legal fees falsely claiming in advertisements and postings that Mr. Pace was behind the CRRRG as Lisa Marie Peterson (collaborator and lackey for Woodmen Hills) was shown in documents (evidence) as Greens inside girl as shown she sent him an email about running for the board.
That’s right ratepayers footed the bill for legal fees not associated with Mr. Pace and yet the criminally corrupt board of bought puppets didn’t tell you the truth cause is isn’t what it seems so the $130,000 (est. salary) dollar employee known as Lisa Marie Peterson (district sellout and Pizzi BFF and Greens inside girl) appears to have collaborated with Cole and the other board members to put out the propaganda to cause others to get pissed when the reality is it is a sham and misleading information. Bring it on Peterson but alas she is Greens inside girl as shown in recently received records about the CRRRG case, she sent Green Mr. Paces candidate form for not legitimate reason as proven in court.
The estimated amount spent on the CRRRG matter comes in at just under $40,000.00 (estimated) for a case they were not a named party to and since the request for all legal fees were denied an estimate is all we have so we apologize for this but being transparent isn’t in the best interest of the district as it wouldn’t make “one man” out to be as bad as they want to.
Exposed wants to post the real numbers but alas the district as denied those CORA files.
Get the facts not the distorted BS being pumped out by a hack and his group.
Lindsay the truth isn’t always what they say it is and the facts are not as truthful as the hack and the corrupted board of losers is.
Exposed always welcomes the facts with proof alas Woodmen Hills has neither just BS from the employees who earn 6 figures and hide it..
Mrs. Harrison there is your story why is this ….. working for Woodmen Hills informing on one candidate to the very men who buy elections and helping the board attack a resident with misleading facts as shown.
It was the files on record at the County Assessors office and the claims made by WHMD. If exposed is wrong then by all means prove us wrong and I will provide a copy of the claims sheet as provided by the BK court. as filed on 4-3-2017.
Creditors are entitled to their debt if valid but not double the debt. Exposed is tired of the false narrative being put out so the puppets can keep their seats.
Woodmenhills Exposed 
851. False Claims—18 U.S.C. § 152(4)
Subsection (4) of Section 152 sets out the offense of filing a false bankruptcy claim. A “claim” is a document filed in a bankruptcy proceeding by a creditor of the debtor. It is sometimes also called a “proof of claim.” For the purposes of this section the nature of the claim is immaterial– i.e., the claim can be secured or unsecured, liquidated or unliquidated, disputed or undisputed. A “false” claim is one that is known by the creditor to be factually untrue at the time the claim is filed.
Subsection (4) provides:
A person who…knowingly and fraudulently presents any false claim for proof against the estate of a debtor, or uses any such claim in any case under title 11, in a personal capacity or as or through an agent, proxy, or attorney;…shall be fined…, imprisoned…, or both.
The elements of a false claim violation are:
1.that bankruptcy proceedings had been commenced;
2.that defendant presented or caused to be presented a proof of claim in the bankruptcy;
3.that the proof of claim was false as to a material matter; and
4.that the defendant knew the proof of claim was false and acted knowingly and fraudulently.
United States v. Overmyer, 867 F.2d 937, 949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 813 (1989).
A claim can be asserted by a creditor whether or not it is reduced to judgment, whether the claim is liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, mature, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured or unsecured. United States v. Connery, 867 F.2d 929, 934 (reh’g denied)(6th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand 911 F.2d 734 (1990).
Since the falsity of a claim, in most cases, is obvious, the key issue frequently becomes what was the defendant’s state of mind at the time of the filing of the claim. Good faith is a complete defense to this charge. The filing of a false claim is not a crime where there was a good faith belief in its accuracy. United States v. Connery, 867 F.2d 929, 934 (reh’g denied)(6th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand 911 F.2d 734 (1990).
A proof of claim is not false merely because it may be inaccurate or erroneous in any or all respects. The claim may be asserted by a creditor in good faith even though the moneys being sought are thereafter successfully disputed by the debtor or disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court. Instead, a proof of claim is false if the statements contained therein are intentionally inaccurate and submitted without any good faith basis for the claim and are not the result of some mistake or clerical error or inadvertent omission.
United States v. Overmyer, 867 F.2d 937, 950 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 813 (1989), appeal after remand, 899 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 939 (1990)(quoting above instruction with approval).
LikeLike
Please post the filing of 4/12/2017 as of record with the BR court
LikeLike
There are no records for a filing on that date.
Can you be a little bit more specific.
The court only has a filing for a mortgage matter
for April 28, 2017
LikeLike